Skip to main content
Constant Contact logo

Constant Contact

Based exclusively on public evidence • 20 criteria (Privacy + AI)
Last review: 26 Feb 2026

E-
AITS IA

AI Trust Summary

AI Training
Not disclosed in documentation
Data Retention
Not specified in documentation
Opt-out
Only generic controls (cookies, ads)
AIPrivacy
E-
BasePrivacy
C-
  • In AI: it does not document a mechanism for contesting automated decisions, which may limit customer control.
  • In Privacy Base: it does not mention AI data retention, creating uncertainties about the handling of sensitive information.

Safer Alternatives

Higher-rated software in the same category

See Full Alternative Comparison

Attention Points in AI (3)

AI criteria that require attention. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.

  • Constant Contact
  • Does not mention a mechanism for contesting automated decisions, limiting transparency.
  • The document does not specify AI data retention, which creates uncertainties.
  • Requiring a contractual clause that addresses contestation and data retention can mitigate risks.

AI decision contestation mechanism not available

The company does not mention a specific channel to contest automated decisions, which may limit customer transparency and control.

Automated AI decisions have no explanation available

The lack of information on how automated decisions are made can generate distrust among customers about the use of email campaign data.

AI data retention (prompts and responses) is not disclosed

The document does not specify how long email campaign data and user interactions are retained, which can create uncertainties.

Source: vendor public documents

Compliances in AI (1)

AI criteria the company meets. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 1 criteria.

  • Constant Contact
  • Clearly identifies the company as responsible for data processing, ensuring transparency.
  • Provides multiple contact methods, facilitating communication about privacy.
  • These practices strengthen due diligence and trust in data management.

AI training opt-out control available

The company presents privacy controls, allowing customers to opt out of having their email campaign data used for AI training.

Source: vendor public documents

Highlights in Privacy (3)

Most relevant criteria for this category. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.

Sensitive data processing without additional documented safeguards

The absence of mention of sensitive data and its safeguards can generate additional risks for customer privacy.

Data controller and processor roles clearly defined

The company clearly identifies itself as responsible for processing email campaign data and user interactions, ensuring transparency.

Data controller identity and contact clearly disclosed

The company provides clear information about its identity and contact methods, facilitating communication about email campaign data.

Source: vendor public documents

Critical Alerts

  • Retenção de prompts e respostas de IA sem prazo definido: Crucial para que clientes saibam quando seus dados serão eliminados..
  • Uso de dados para treinamento de IA não é declarado: Importante para que clientes saibam como seus dados estão sendo utilizados.

Conformance analysis (20)

Premium Feature
AITS Criterion 9
Compliant

Data controller and processor roles clearly defined

Reference: ISO/IEC 27701 (7.3)

AITS Criterion 10
Compliant

Data controller's identity and contact clearly informed

Reference: ISO/IEC 27701 (7.3)

AITS Criterion 11
Compliant

Contact channel for privacy issues available

Reference: ISO/IEC 27701 (7.3)

Source: vendor public documents

Follow this company and access all 20 criteria

Track score changes, get alerts on policy updates, and view the full conformance analysis

Sign up free

Don't miss any update

Sign up to follow this company and track changes in privacy and AI scores

Sign up free

Why trust the AITS Index: Open Community Audit

Public transparency, peer review and open evidence trails — all verifiable by the community

Trust guarantees

Peer review

users, professionals and experts confirm or contest items online.

Public history

vendor and index changes are versioned and accessible.

Participate

Evidence, confirmations and contestations

participate in the collaborative validation of AITS criteria

Contact us

Understanding Privacy and Security in Constant Contact Email Marketing

Clear Roles of Data Controller and Processor

Constant Contact excels in defining the roles of data controller and processor, which is crucial for users concerned about data privacy. This clarity ensures that users know who is responsible for their data and how it is managed. With a defined data controller, users can feel more secure knowing there is a specific entity accountable for compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR and LGPD. This transparency can enhance trust and facilitate better communication regarding data handling practices.

Accessible Contact Information for Data Controllers

Another strength of Constant Contact is the clear identification of the data controller's identity and contact information. This feature allows users to easily reach out with any privacy-related inquiries or concerns. Having a direct line of communication can empower users, giving them the ability to seek clarification on how their data is used and to exercise their rights under privacy laws. This proactive approach can help mitigate potential issues before they escalate.

Lack of Mechanism for Contesting AI Decisions

Despite its strengths, Constant Contact has notable weaknesses, particularly in its handling of automated decision-making processes. The absence of a mechanism for contesting AI decisions can limit users' control over their data. This is particularly concerning for those who may be affected by automated marketing strategies that rely on AI. Users should be aware that without this mechanism, they may not have recourse if they disagree with decisions made by the software based on their data.

Undefined Data Retention Policies

Another significant weakness is the lack of clarity regarding the retention of AI prompts and responses. Users should be cautious, as the absence of a defined retention period can lead to uncertainty about how long their data is stored and used. This could potentially expose sensitive information to unnecessary risks. To mitigate this, users should regularly review their data usage settings and inquire about the specific retention policies with Constant Contact to ensure their data is handled appropriately.

Practical Guidance: Review Privacy Settings

To enhance privacy while using Constant Contact, users should take proactive steps to review their privacy settings. This includes checking the options related to data sharing and marketing preferences. Users can also limit the amount of personal information they provide and utilize features that allow them to control how their data is used. Regularly updating these settings can help users maintain better control over their data and align with their privacy expectations.

Alternatives and Precautions

For users concerned about the weaknesses identified, exploring alternative email marketing platforms that offer more robust privacy features may be beneficial. Look for platforms that provide clear mechanisms for contesting automated decisions and have well-defined data retention policies. Additionally, consider implementing data encryption and anonymization practices where possible to further protect sensitive information. By taking these precautions, users can better safeguard their data while still leveraging email marketing tools effectively.

Other Email Marketing software

Dive into in-depth research and analysis of each player

Source: vendor public documents

Analyzed Sources

Public documents used in the audit of Constant Contact:

Evidence, confirmations and contestations

participate in the collaborative validation of AITS criteria

Contact us

Scope & Limitations

TrustThis/AITS assessments are based exclusively on publicly available information, duly cited with date and URL, following the AITS methodology (privacy & AI transparency).

The content is indicative in nature, intended for screening and comparison, not replacing internal audits.

TrustThis/AITS does not perform invasive tests, does not access vendor technology environments and does not process customer personal data. Conclusions reflect only the vendor's public communication at the date of collection.

Source: vendor public documents