
Beehiiv
Based exclusively on public evidence • 20 criteria (Privacy + AI)
Last review: 26 Feb 2026
AI Trust Summary
- •In AI: it does not document an opt-out option for the use of email data in AI training, which may raise privacy concerns.
- •In Core Privacy: it does not specify email data retention periods, impacting user trust in the management of their information.
Safer Alternatives
Higher-rated software in the same category
Attention Points in AI (3)
AI criteria that require attention. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.
- •Beehiiv
- •Omission of email data retention periods may impact transparency and trust.
- •Does not mention a mechanism to challenge automated decisions, leaving users without options.
- •Requiring a data retention clause and a challenge mechanism in the contract can mitigate risks.
AI data retention (prompts and responses) is not disclosed
The policy does not specify how long email data and user interactions are retained, which can impact transparency and customer trust.
AI training opt-out option not available
The lack of a clear option for users to opt out of having their email data used for AI training may raise privacy concerns.
Use of artificial intelligence is not disclosed in policies
The absence of a declaration about the use of artificial intelligence in functionalities can lead to distrust among users about how their email data is handled.
Source: vendor public documents
Compliances in AI (2)
AI criteria the company meets. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 2 criteria.
- •Beehiiv
- •Clearly documents data controller and processor roles, increasing transparency.
- •Identifies personal data recipients in detail, such as Amazon and Stripe, facilitating understanding of data processing.
- •These practices strengthen due diligence and customer trust.
Policy on data use for AI training clearly stated
The policy mentions the use of email data to improve services, but does not clarify how this relates to AI training, creating uncertainties.
Automated AI decisions explained in an understandable way
The policy mentions personalization based on email data, but does not detail how decisions are made, which can generate distrust.
Source: vendor public documents
Highlights in Privacy (3)
Most relevant criteria for this category. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.
Safeguards for international transfers are not mentioned
The lack of information about safeguards for international transfers of email data can generate insecurity about the protection of user information.
Data controller and processor roles clearly defined
The policy clearly identifies the responsible company and defines the scope of services, which is fundamental for transparency.
Data controller identity and contact clearly disclosed
The policy provides clear information about the responsible company and a contact channel for privacy questions, increasing user trust.
Source: vendor public documents
Critical Alerts
- •Opção de opt-out de uso de dados de email para treinamento de IA não disponível: Crucial para assegurar que os usuários tenham controle sobre seus dados e como são utilizados..
- •Mecanismo de contestação de decisões automatizadas não disponível: Importante para garantir que os usuários possam questionar decisões que impactam suas experiências.
Conformance analysis (20)
Retention of email data and user interactions without a defined period
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001 (8.2) + ISO/IEC 27701 (7.4.6)
Opt-out option for using email data for AI training not available
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001 (8.3) + ISO/IEC 29100 + EU AI Act
Use of artificial intelligence in functionalities not declared
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001 (7.4)
Source: vendor public documents
Follow this company and access all 20 criteria
Track score changes, get alerts on policy updates, and view the full conformance analysis
Don't miss any update
Sign up to follow this company and track changes in privacy and AI scores
Why trust the AITS Index: Open Community Audit
Public transparency, peer review and open evidence trails — all verifiable by the community
Trust guarantees
Peer review
users, professionals and experts confirm or contest items online.
Public history
vendor and index changes are versioned and accessible.
Participate
Evidence, confirmations and contestations
participate in the collaborative validation of AITS criteria
Understanding Privacy and AI Governance in Beehiiv Email Marketing
Transparency in Data Roles
Beehiiv excels in defining the roles of data controllers and processors, which is crucial for users concerned about data privacy. This clarity ensures that users know who is responsible for managing their data, thereby enhancing trust. The platform clearly identifies the recipients of personal data in its privacy policy, allowing users to understand who has access to their information. This transparency is a significant strength, as it aligns with privacy regulations like GDPR and LGPD, which emphasize the importance of clear data handling practices.
Purposeful Data Processing
Another strength of Beehiiv is its clear listing of data processing purposes by category. Users can easily find out how their data will be used, which is essential for informed consent under privacy laws. This clarity helps users feel more secure in their interactions with the platform, knowing that their data will not be used for undisclosed purposes. However, while these strengths are commendable, users should still be vigilant about how their data is managed.
Undefined Data Retention Policies
One of the notable weaknesses of Beehiiv is its lack of a defined data retention period for email data and user interactions. This absence of clarity can lead to concerns about how long personal information is stored and whether it could be misused over time. Users should be aware that without a clear retention policy, their data may be kept indefinitely, which could violate principles of data minimization outlined in GDPR and LGPD. To mitigate this risk, users should regularly review their data stored on the platform and request deletion of any unnecessary information.
Missing Opt-Out Options for AI Training
Another significant concern is the absence of an opt-out option for the use of email data in AI training. This lack of choice can be alarming for users who are cautious about how their data is utilized, especially in machine learning contexts. Users should be proactive in understanding how their data may be used and consider reaching out to Beehiiv for clarification on this matter. If privacy is a top priority, users might want to explore alternative platforms that provide clear opt-out options for AI data usage.
No Mechanism for Contesting Automated Decisions
Additionally, Beehiiv does not offer a mechanism for contesting automated decisions made through its platform. This is a critical shortcoming, as it limits users' ability to challenge decisions that may affect their email marketing strategies. Users should be aware that this could lead to situations where automated processes adversely impact their campaigns without recourse. As a precaution, users may want to maintain manual oversight of their campaigns and decisions to ensure they align with their marketing goals.
Practical Steps for Enhanced Privacy
To enhance privacy while using Beehiiv, users should take several practical steps. First, regularly check the settings related to data sharing and permissions to ensure they align with personal privacy preferences. Users should also consider implementing additional security measures, such as two-factor authentication, to protect their accounts. Furthermore, staying informed about Beehiiv's updates regarding privacy policies and AI governance can help users make better-informed decisions about their data. If privacy concerns persist, evaluating alternative email marketing platforms that prioritize user rights and offer more robust privacy features may be beneficial.
Other Email Marketing software
Dive into in-depth research and analysis of each player

Adobe Marketo Engage
Oracle Eloqua

Brevo

Customer.io

Drip

EngageBay

Zoho Marketing Automation

Constant Contact
Source: vendor public documents
Analyzed Sources
Public documents used in the audit of Beehiiv:
Evidence, confirmations and contestations
participate in the collaborative validation of AITS criteria
Scope & Limitations
TrustThis/AITS assessments are based exclusively on publicly available information, duly cited with date and URL, following the AITS methodology (privacy & AI transparency).
The content is indicative in nature, intended for screening and comparison, not replacing internal audits.
TrustThis/AITS does not perform invasive tests, does not access vendor technology environments and does not process customer personal data. Conclusions reflect only the vendor's public communication at the date of collection.
Source: vendor public documents