

Close
Based exclusively on public evidence • 20 criteria (Privacy + AI)
Last review: 21 Feb 2026
AI Trust Summary
- •In AI: it does not document how long it retains AI prompts and responses, which can impact user transparency and control.
- •In Core Privacy: it does not mention the data retention period, which can lead to inadequate storage and use practices for customer information.
Safer Alternatives
Higher-rated software in the same category
Attention Points in AI (3)
AI criteria that require attention. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.
- •Close
- •does not inform the data retention period, which can compromise information management.
- •does not offer an opt-out option for data use in AI training, limiting user control.
- •it is necessary to require contractual clauses that address these critical points.
AI data retention (prompts and responses) is not disclosed
The policy does not state how long sales contact and interaction data is retained, impacting transparency for customers.
AI training opt-out option not available
There is no clear information on how customers can opt out of having their contact data used for AI training, limiting user control.
Ethical AI principles and anti-bias measures not documented
The lack of commitment to ethical AI use can result in discrimination and social harm, affecting Close's reputation.
Source: vendor public documents
Compliances in AI (3)
AI criteria the company meets. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.
- •Close
- •provides a specific contact channel for privacy concerns, facilitating communication.
- •clearly documents the roles of data controller and processor, promoting transparency.
- •these practices are beneficial for due diligence and strengthen customer trust.
Policy on data use for AI training clearly stated
The company mentions the use of contact data for product development, but does not detail how this is done, which can generate uncertainties.
Use of artificial intelligence clearly disclosed in policies
The policy mentions the use of automation in communication, but does not detail the specific use of AI, which can raise questions.
AI features clearly identified with their purposes
The policy lists 'Communication Automation' as a functionality, but does not detail its specific purposes, which can generate uncertainties.
Source: vendor public documents
Highlights in Privacy (3)
Most relevant criteria for this category. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.
Data retention period not stated in the policy
The absence of information about the retention period for contact and sales interaction data can lead to inadequate storage practices.
Privacy contact channel available
Close provides a specific contact channel for privacy concerns, facilitating communication with customers.
Information about international data transfers is missing
The lack of information on international transfers of contact data can generate insecurity and legal risks for Close.
Source: vendor public documents
Critical Alerts
- •Opção de opt-out de treinamento de IA não disponível: A ausência de uma opção de opt-out pode afetar a confiança dos clientes na gestão de seus dados..
- •Período de retenção de dados não informado na política: É fundamental que o CRM tenha clareza sobre a retenção de dados para evitar riscos legais.
Conformance analysis (20)
Retention of AI prompts and responses without a defined period
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001 (8.2) + ISO/IEC 27701 (7.4.6)
AI training opt-out option not available
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001 (8.3) + ISO/IEC 29100 + EU AI Act
Ethical AI principles and anti-bias measures not documented
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001 (6.1) + ISO/IEC TR 24028 + EU AI Act (Art. 9)
Source: vendor public documents
Follow this company and access all 20 criteria
Track score changes, get alerts on policy updates, and view the full conformance analysis
Don't miss any update
Sign up to follow this company and track changes in privacy and AI scores
Why trust the AITS Index: Open Community Audit
Public transparency, peer review and open evidence trails — all verifiable by the community
Trust guarantees
Peer review
users, professionals and experts confirm or contest items online.
Public history
vendor and index changes are versioned and accessible.
Participate
Evidence, confirmations and contestations
participate in the collaborative validation of AITS criteria
Close CRM: Understanding Privacy and AI Governance for Informed Users
Privacy Strength: Accessible Contact Channel for Privacy Issues
Close stands out with its dedicated contact channel for privacy-related inquiries. This feature allows users to easily reach out for assistance regarding their data privacy concerns, fostering a sense of trust and transparency. Users can feel more secure knowing that they have a direct line to address any issues or questions about how their data is being handled. This proactive approach is essential, especially in light of regulations like the GDPR and LGPD, which emphasize user rights and the importance of clear communication from data controllers.
Privacy Strength: Clearly Defined Roles of Data Controller and Processor
Another strength of Close is its clear delineation of roles between data controllers and processors. This clarity is crucial for users, as it helps them understand who is responsible for their data at any given time. Knowing that these roles are well-defined can provide users with confidence that their data is being managed appropriately. This is particularly important for compliance with standards such as ISO 27701, which require organizations to establish clear data governance frameworks.
Privacy Weakness: Undefined Retention Period for AI Prompts and Responses
Despite its strengths, Close has notable weaknesses, particularly concerning its AI governance. The lack of a defined retention period for AI prompts and responses poses a significant risk. Without transparency on how long these data points are stored, users may unknowingly expose themselves to potential data misuse. This ambiguity can lead to non-compliance with privacy regulations, which require organizations to inform users about data retention practices.
Privacy Weakness: No Opt-Out Option for AI Training
Another concerning aspect is the absence of an opt-out option for AI training. Users who prefer not to have their data utilized for training AI models may feel uncomfortable with this lack of choice. This could lead to a breach of user trust, especially for those who are conscious of their data privacy rights under regulations like the GDPR. Users should be aware of this limitation and consider whether they are comfortable with their data being used in this manner.
Practical Guidance: Check Your Privacy Settings
To mitigate some of the risks associated with Close, users should actively check their privacy settings. Ensure that you are aware of what data is being collected and how it is being used. While Close provides a contact channel for privacy inquiries, users should take the initiative to reach out and clarify any uncertainties regarding data retention and usage policies. Additionally, consider implementing internal policies that align with GDPR and LGPD requirements to safeguard your data practices.
Practical Guidance: Explore Alternatives for Enhanced Privacy
Given the weaknesses identified, users may want to explore alternative CRM solutions that offer more robust privacy features. Look for platforms that provide clear data retention policies and options to opt-out of AI training. Conducting a thorough audit of potential alternatives can help ensure that your organization remains compliant with privacy regulations and maintains user trust. Always prioritize solutions that align with your privacy standards and offer transparency in data handling practices.
Other Sales CRM software
Dive into in-depth research and analysis of each player
Source: vendor public documents
Analyzed Sources
Public documents used in the audit of Close:
Evidence, confirmations and contestations
participate in the collaborative validation of AITS criteria
Scope & Limitations
TrustThis/AITS assessments are based exclusively on publicly available information, duly cited with date and URL, following the AITS methodology (privacy & AI transparency).
The content is indicative in nature, intended for screening and comparison, not replacing internal audits.
TrustThis/AITS does not perform invasive tests, does not access vendor technology environments and does not process customer personal data. Conclusions reflect only the vendor's public communication at the date of collection.
Source: vendor public documents






