

Fireflies AI
Based exclusively on public evidence • 20 criteria (Privacy + AI)
Last review: 13 Feb 2026
AI Trust Summary
Safer Alternatives
Higher-rated software in the same category
Attention Points in AI (2)
AI criteria that require attention. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 2 criteria.
AI decision contestation mechanism not available
Ethical AI principles and anti-bias measures not documented
Source: vendor public documents
Compliances in AI (3)
AI criteria the company meets. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.
Use of artificial intelligence clearly disclosed in policies
AI data retention policy clearly documented
AI training opt-out control available
Source: vendor public documents
Highlights in Privacy (3)
Most relevant criteria for this category. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.
Additional safeguards documented for sensitive data processing
Transparency about international data transfers documented
Adequate safeguards for international transfers documented
Source: vendor public documents
Conformance analysis (20)
Additional safeguards documented for sensitive data processing
Reference: ISO/IEC 29100
Transparency about international data transfers documented
Reference: ISO/IEC 27701 (7.3)
Adequate safeguards for international transfers documented
Reference: ISO/IEC 27701 (7.3)
Source: vendor public documents
Follow this company and access all 20 criteria
Track score changes, get alerts on policy updates, and view the full conformance analysis
Don't miss any update
Sign up to follow this company and track changes in privacy and AI scores
Why trust the AITS Index: Open Community Audit
Public transparency, peer review and open evidence trails — all verifiable by the community
Trust guarantees
Peer review
users, professionals and experts confirm or contest items online.
Public history
vendor and index changes are versioned and accessible.
Participate
Evidence, confirmations and contestations
participate in the collaborative validation of AITS criteria
Fireflies AI: Privacy and AI Governance Insights
Transparency in Data Processing
Fireflies AI excels in its transparency regarding data processing purposes. With a strong OPTI Base Privacy Score of 89%, the software clearly lists the categories of data it processes and the specific purposes for each. This clarity is essential for users who want to understand how their data is being utilized, ensuring compliance with regulations like GDPR and LGPD. Users can feel more secure knowing that their information is handled with clear intentions, which fosters trust in the platform.
Clear Data Controller Information
Another notable strength of Fireflies AI is its provision of clear information regarding the identity and contact details of the data controller. This is crucial for users who may have questions or concerns about their data privacy. With this transparency, users can easily reach out for inquiries or requests related to their personal data, enhancing their control over their information. This aligns well with the principles outlined in ISO 27701, which emphasizes accountability in data management.
Lack of Automated Decision Contestation
Despite its strengths, Fireflies AI has significant weaknesses, particularly concerning the absence of a mechanism for contesting automated decisions made by its AI. With an OPTI IA Score of only 33%, this raises concerns about user rights, particularly in relation to GDPR Article 22, which grants individuals the right not to be subject to automated decision-making without human intervention. Users should be aware that this limitation could affect their ability to challenge AI-generated transcriptions or decisions, which may lead to potential inaccuracies or biases.
Ethical AI Principles Not Documented
Another critical weakness is the lack of documented ethical AI principles and anti-bias measures. This absence can leave users vulnerable to unintended biases in AI outputs, which is particularly concerning in sensitive applications. Users should consider this risk when relying on Fireflies AI for important tasks. To mitigate this, it may be prudent to supplement Fireflies AI with additional tools or processes that ensure fairness and accountability in AI decision-making.
Opt-Out Control for AI Training
Fireflies AI does provide users with the option to opt-out of having their data used for AI training purposes. However, this feature is not as robust as it could be, leading to potential concerns about user consent and data usage. Users should actively check their settings to ensure they have opted out if they do not wish their data to contribute to AI training. Being proactive in managing these settings can help users maintain greater control over their personal information.
Practical Steps for Enhanced Privacy
To enhance privacy while using Fireflies AI, users should regularly review their privacy settings and ensure they understand the implications of data sharing. It is advisable to familiarize oneself with the platform's privacy policy and data handling practices. Additionally, users might consider using alternative AI tools that offer stronger protections against automated decision-making and clearer ethical guidelines. By staying informed and vigilant, users can better navigate the complexities of AI tools while safeguarding their privacy rights.
Other AI Tools software
Dive into in-depth research and analysis of each player
Source: vendor public documents
Analyzed Sources
Public documents used in the audit of Fireflies AI:
Evidence, confirmations and contestations
participate in the collaborative validation of AITS criteria
Scope & Limitations
TrustThis/AITS assessments are based exclusively on publicly available information, duly cited with date and URL, following the AITS methodology (privacy & AI transparency).
The content is indicative in nature, intended for screening and comparison, not replacing internal audits.
TrustThis/AITS does not perform invasive tests, does not access vendor technology environments and does not process customer personal data. Conclusions reflect only the vendor's public communication at the date of collection.
Source: vendor public documents





