Skip to main content
Otter AI logo

Otter AI

Based exclusively on public evidence • 20 criteria (Privacy + AI)
Last review: 13 Feb 2026

C+
AITS IA
Privacy Rating by TrustThis — Verified Seal

AI Trust Summary

AI Training
Criterion not evaluated
Data Retention
Retention policy documented
Opt-out
Only generic controls (cookies, ads)
AIPrivacy
C+
BasePrivacy
A-

Safer Alternatives

Higher-rated software in the same category

See Full Alternative Comparison

Attention Points in AI (2)

AI criteria that require attention. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 2 criteria.

Ethical AI principles and anti-bias measures not documented

AI decision contestation mechanism not available

Source: vendor public documents

Compliances in AI (3)

AI criteria the company meets. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.

AI data retention policy clearly documented

Use of artificial intelligence clearly disclosed in policies

AI features clearly identified with their purposes

Source: vendor public documents

Highlights in Privacy (3)

Most relevant criteria for this category. Buy the Premium Analysis to see all 3 criteria.

Data retention period not stated in the policy

Data controller and processor roles clearly defined

Data controller identity and contact clearly disclosed

Source: vendor public documents

Conformance analysis (20)

Premium Feature
AITS Criterion 1
Compliant

AI data retention policy clearly documented

Reference: ISO/IEC 42001 (8.2) + ISO/IEC 27701 (7.4.6)

AITS Criterion 4
Compliant

Use of artificial intelligence clearly disclosed in policies

Reference: ISO/IEC 42001 (7.4)

AITS Criterion 6
Compliant

AI features clearly identified with their purposes

Reference: ISO/IEC 42001 (7.5)

Source: vendor public documents

Follow this company and access all 20 criteria

Track score changes, get alerts on policy updates, and view the full conformance analysis

Sign up free

Don't miss any update

Sign up to follow this company and track changes in privacy and AI scores

Sign up free

Why trust the AITS Index: Open Community Audit

Public transparency, peer review and open evidence trails — all verifiable by the community

Trust guarantees

Peer review

users, professionals and experts confirm or contest items online.

Public history

vendor and index changes are versioned and accessible.

Participate

Evidence, confirmations and contestations

participate in the collaborative validation of AITS criteria

Contact us

Understanding Privacy and Security in Otter AI: A Comprehensive Guide

Clear Documentation of Data Processing Purposes

Otter AI excels in transparency regarding its data processing practices. The platform clearly outlines the purposes for which audio recordings and transcriptions are utilized, contributing to a strong AITS Privacy Score of 81%. This clarity allows users to understand how their data is being used, which is crucial for compliance with regulations like GDPR and LGPD. When users are aware of the specific purposes, they can make informed decisions about their data sharing and usage, enhancing their overall trust in the platform.

Defined Roles of Data Controllers and Processors

Another strength of Otter AI lies in its clear definition of data controller and processor roles. This is essential for users who want to ensure that their data is handled appropriately. Knowing who is responsible for data management helps users understand their rights and the obligations of the service provider. This clarity can be particularly beneficial for businesses that need to comply with ISO 27701 standards, as it helps delineate accountability in data governance.

Lack of Ethical AI Principles

Despite its strengths, Otter AI has notable weaknesses, particularly concerning its documentation of ethical AI principles. The absence of clear guidelines on ethical AI usage raises concerns about potential biases and discrimination in the AI-driven transcription processes. Users should be aware that without these principles, there is a risk that the AI may produce biased outputs, which could affect the integrity of the transcriptions. To mitigate this risk, users should consider implementing additional review processes for critical documents generated by the AI.

Absence of AI Decision Contestation Mechanism

Another significant weakness is the lack of a mechanism for contesting AI decisions. This absence means that users may have limited recourse if they believe that an AI-generated transcription is incorrect or biased. This could be particularly concerning for users in regulated industries where accuracy is paramount. To address this, users should maintain a manual record of important meetings and discussions, allowing them to cross-reference AI outputs and ensure accuracy.

Unclear Data Retention Policies

Otter AI's policy does not specify data retention periods, which can create uncertainty about how long sensitive information is stored. This lack of clarity can be problematic for users who need to comply with data protection regulations that mandate specific retention timelines. Users are advised to regularly review their data stored on the platform and delete any unnecessary recordings or transcriptions. Additionally, reaching out to Otter AI's support for clarification on data retention policies is a prudent step to ensure compliance with GDPR and LGPD requirements.

Practical Steps for Enhanced Privacy and Security

To enhance privacy and security while using Otter AI, users should take proactive measures. First, regularly check the settings related to data sharing and permissions to ensure that only necessary data is being shared. Users should also consider enabling features that allow for manual review of AI-generated content to catch any potential inaccuracies. Lastly, exploring alternative transcription services that prioritize ethical AI practices may be worthwhile for users who are particularly concerned about bias and discrimination in AI outputs. By taking these steps, users can better safeguard their data and ensure compliance with relevant privacy regulations.

Other AI Tools software

Dive into in-depth research and analysis of each player

Source: vendor public documents

Evidence, confirmations and contestations

participate in the collaborative validation of AITS criteria

Contact us

Scope & Limitations

TrustThis/AITS assessments are based exclusively on publicly available information, duly cited with date and URL, following the AITS methodology (privacy & AI transparency).

The content is indicative in nature, intended for screening and comparison, not replacing internal audits.

TrustThis/AITS does not perform invasive tests, does not access vendor technology environments and does not process customer personal data. Conclusions reflect only the vendor's public communication at the date of collection.

Source: vendor public documents